[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parchment
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: parchment
- From: Roberta Lavadour <paper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 07:09:21 -0800
- Message-id: <199812211513.HAA22578@palimpsest.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.dreamscape.com/pdverhey" <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dorothy -
I'm afraid the Hyde used in the delivery of the transcripts is not nearly as
noble as a goat. I think it was *labeled* vellum, and had a strong warning
for others to use only vellum, but wasn't actually vellum itself.
Probably just a youthful indescression on some clerk's part.
Roberta
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Africa <africa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BOOK_ARTS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, December 21, 1998 5:32 AM
Subject: parchment
> On the radio this morning as I was listening to NPR (National Public
>Radio), one of the reporters mentioned in passing that the clerk at the
>House of Representatives transcribed the articles of impeachment passed
>by the House onto parchment to serve in the formal transfer of the
>proceedings to the Senate. I presume this means genuine
>vellum/parchment rather than one of the various toned papers. I was
>wondering how often this is done, certainly not for every piece of
>legislation passed on to the Senate! Not everyone would agree that
>Clinton is a scapegoat for the Republicans, but there may very well be a
>scraped goat in the proceedings.
> Dorothy Africa
>