[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Book Art Criticism: New Thoughts
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: Book Art Criticism: New Thoughts
- From: "ANGELA B. COBB" <angco@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 18:19:45 -0400
- Message-Id: <200009032012.NAA21316@palimpsest.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.philobiblon.com" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
And there are rules of grammar--rules that exist to make
> > the language/the text possible to read and understand.
>
> Isn't the last sentence odd? I thought that people who read and
understand, but
> texts are to be read and understood. Or this is another one of those
English
> idioms that is grammatical but illogical?
The sentence IMPLIES a person who will. . .: rules that exist to make
> > the language/the text possible (for us) to read and understand. (read
pronounced as reed)
If we were talking about the text, it would read " . . .the text possible to
be read
and (to be) understood. (read pronounced as red)
Angee
***********************************************
BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:
<http://www.philobiblon.com>
***********************************************