[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Book Art Criticism: New Thoughts
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: Re: Book Art Criticism: New Thoughts
- From: Yixi Zhang <zyx@UVIC.CA>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 22:55:34 -0700
- Message-Id: <200009040554.WAA26196@palimpsest.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.philobiblon.com" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
"ANGELA B. COBB" wrote:
> And there are rules of grammar--rules that exist to make
> > > the language/the text possible to read and understand.
> >
> > Isn't the last sentence odd? I thought that people who read and
> understand, but
> > texts are to be read and understood. Or this is another one of those
> English
> > idioms that is grammatical but illogical?
>
> The sentence IMPLIES a person who will. . .: rules that exist to make
> > > the language/the text possible (for us) to read and understand. (read
> pronounced as reed)
>
> If we were talking about the text, it would read " . . .the text possible to
> be read
> and (to be) understood. (read pronounced as red)
>
Very nicely explained and thank you very much for clearing my head, Angela! --
Yixi
***********************************************
BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:
<http://www.philobiblon.com>
***********************************************