[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[BKARTS] FW: Sizing Question
- To: BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
- Subject: [BKARTS] FW: Sizing Question
- From: Katie Harper <knharper@FUSE.NET>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:06:16 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <B8F33CD5.50B9%knharper@fuse.net>
- Message-ID: <B8F400F8.50DC%knharper@fuse.net>
- Sender: "Book_Arts-L: READ THE FAQ at http://www.philobiblon.com" <BOOK_ARTS-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
- User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)
***********************************************
CENTRAL NEW YORK BOOK ARTS: TRADITIONAL TO INNOVATIVE
See The Exhibition Online, And Order Your Catalog.
<http://www.philobiblon.com>
***********************************************
I have read conflicting opinions about sizing in paper and how this affects
how well the paper will print, especially with letterpress. Conventional
wisdom says that a sized paper will make a better surface for things like
writing and screen printing, while an unsized paper will print better with
letterpress or processes where the ink needs to be pressed into the paper a
bit. This is also the reason that sometimes moist paper prints better, I
have been told. However, it seems like sizing would impede ink spread and
actually make the ink appear darker and sharper, somewhat like a clay
coating. I have had mixed results using sized and unsized paper, and am
wondering if that has anything to do with anything.
I would be interested in hearing from others about your experiences/advice
with sized or unsized papers.
Thanks.
Katie Harper
Ars Brevis Press
Cincinnati, OH
513-233-9588
***********************************************
BOOK_ARTS-L: The listserv for all the book arts.
For subscription information, the Archive, and other related
resources and links go to the Book_Arts-L FAQ at:
<http://www.philobiblon.com>
Archive maintained and suppported by Conservation OnLine
<http://palimpsest.stanford.edu>
***********************************************