[Table of Contents] [Search]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cataloguing in-analytics



Hi John:

>       We do not have a satisfactory way of cataloguing in-analytics 
> here at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center.  For those of 
> you who are not cataloguers, in-analytics are articles in magazines 
> acquired by a library because the author or subject of the article is 
> of research interest.  These articles may be intact in the magazine 
> issue or ripped out of it.  Often these articles come to us as part 
> of larger collections devoted to the author or subject.>>

At my library we have developed a format for the 
cataloguing of analytics.
090     We use a local LC call number.
100 1x  Author of article from authority field
245     Title as it appears on the article title page
260     Place of publication : |b publisher (if known), |c 
year (if known). Often this is in brackets for us as we 
must look up the serial where it came from.
300     Descrition: p. nos. from the article, illustration 
if any, and measurement.
500     Mention where you got the title from.
600     Often our analytics are articles from authors we 
collect, so we usually have a personal name subject in the 
record.
700     Seconday author of article if needed
773 0   This is the most important field. It tell you where 
you got the article from: |t title of serial |g vol. x, no. 
x (Season. year), p. nos. |i issn |w (OCoLC) OCLC no.

>       A very thorough approach is to catalogue each article of this 
> kind with a separate record, and link this record, electronically or 
> otherwise, with the holdings record for the magazine.  We have 
> thousands of in-analytics and this method of describing and 
> classifying them is just beyond us right now.  A bare-bones approach 
> is to put such things with newspaper clippings, loose illustrations, 
> menus, and other odds and ends in what we call our vertical file -- 
> the articles then would be put with other material by or about the 
> author or subject and would not be catalogued individually.  Although 
> we have used this approach in the past it is quite skimpy and I'm not 
> sure that the researcher is well-served.>>

Analytics are quite complicated and very time-consuming. So 
the vertical file idea can save some time. If you must save 
time, is there anyway that you can have a finding aid to 
the articles in the vertical file? It would not be a 
national thing but you could have them not only on file but 
as an HTML file as well.

>       But I write this note not to describe what we're doing, but in 
> hopes of hearing of fresh approaches to cataloguing this vexing class 
> of material.>>

Just an idea and an explanation.

Best of luck to you,

Allison Rich


----------------------
Allison L. Rich
Special Collections Cataloguer
richac@bc.edu
Burns Library
Boston College
http://www2.bc.edu/~richac/index.htm


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]

 [CoOL]