[Table of Contents] [Search]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Latin Dictionary Recommendation



In a message dated 12/19/02 12:49:48 PM, edwin-holtum@uiowa.edu writes:

<< I'm hoping someone can recommend a good Latin-English dictionary.  I am 
especially interested in a resource that would be appropriate for a history 
of medicine collection.  Thanks.
 >>

Here are three choices:
1. Cassell's New Latin Dictionary ... by D.P. Simpson, first published in 
1959, and still in print . Advantage: the least expensive of the three (less 
than $20 on Amazon.com), and perfectly adequate for reading classical 
authors. Disadvantage: English definitions not as complete as the next two 
items.
2. A Latin Dictionary ... by Charlton T. Lewis & Charles Short (known to 
professional classicists simply as "Lewis & Short"). Oxford U. Press, first 
published in 1879 and still in print. ADVANTAGE: Unabridged and Complete; 
DISADVANTAGE: Expensive ($175), and English definitions have a definite 
Victorian flavo(u)r.
3. Oxford Latin Dictionary, Ed. by P.G.W. Glare. Oxford, 1982 (in print). 
Advantage: most up to date; follows the principles of the OED (with 
quotations arranged in chronological order); Disadvantage: Most expensive 
(ca. $300)
My recommendation for your purpose is 2 (Charlton & Lewis) -- although it, 
like the other two, are only concerned with ancient authors. Thus, Scribonius 
Largus and Celsus are accounted for, but not, of course, Vesalius or 
Bartholin.
Fred Schreiber


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]

 [CoOL]