Hey, they want your date of birth and a zip code; you can lie about both if
you want to. Big deal. "a whole lot of intrusive questions"? Well, try
two. The article was great fun and worth reading.
At 06:06 AM 4/22/03 -0700, you wrote:
The Washington Post asks you to give them information - which I consider
an intrusion on my privacy - and if you don't you can't read their
article. And then they have the nerve to add a link to their Policy on
privacy. Maybe that's their idea of freedom of the press? Blanche E-K
At 04:44 AM 4/22/03 -0700, you wrote:
Hi everyone
I'm sure that's a most interesting article, but I feel it's not worth my
first having to
answer a whole lot of intrusive questions so that the Washington Post can
send me lots of
unwanted e-mails tailored to my personal requirements! How do others
feel about this, and
is there a way round it?
Best wishes
Tony Curwen
Llanbadarn Fawr, Aberystwyth (for those who like Welsh road signs)
21/04/03 16:44:06, "Lee J. Stoltzfus" <Lee123@yourantiques.com> wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>Interesting article in today's "Washington Post" here:
>http://tinyurl.com/9y21
>
>..with information about Librarians vs. So-Called Patriot Act.
>
>Gives me this strange, recurring image of armies of Librarians in
steel-toed
>stilettos...
>..rising up en masse against the Jackboots.
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Lee J. Stoltzfus
>Lititz, PA
>http://www.yourantiques.com/2.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>