[Table of Contents] [Search]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: original materials v. facsimile exhibits



So his laundry list would be worthwhile exhibiting?



Gabriel



-----Original Message-----
From: Rare book and manuscripts [mailto:EXLIBRIS-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Edward Hoyenski
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:34 PM
To: EXLIBRIS-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXLIBRIS-L] original materials v. facsimile exhibits



Again, I repeat - this is not about if a replica should be shown, but if it
should be pointed out before charging.



I suspect many of Einstein's papers would be incomprehensible to me.  I
don't speak/read German, and I don't read/speak higher math - even if it is
in English.  Thus, intellectual content to me is nil.  It is the experience
of seeing pages he wrote.



If I paid to see an exhibit of Einstein's materials, it would be because I
wanted to see the real items.  If the publicity never said they were
replicas, then I've been cheated out of my money.

Facsimiles and replicas can be very useful.  They can be used where
originals will never be.  But TELL ME before I pay to see them.



Edward Hoyenski

Assistant Curator

Rare Book & Texana Collections

University of North Texas Libraries

ehoyensk@library.unt.edu

940-565-2769

940-565-2599

P.O. Box 305190

Denton, TX 76203



>>> Gabriel Austin <gabrielaustin@EARTHLINK.NET> 5/21/2007 1:13 PM >>>

Payment is the measure? Rather than intellectual content?



There could very well be an excellent exhibition of facsimiles [fakes?] of

Einstein's notebooks [including pages in the interior] showing the

development of his ideas over the years, rather than chiefly some of the

original paper and ink on which they were written.



Gabriel Austin



-----Original Message-----

From: Rare book and manuscripts [mailto:EXLIBRIS-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU] On

Behalf Of Edward Hoyenski

Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:13 AM

To: EXLIBRIS-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU

Subject: Re: [EXLIBRIS-L] original materials v. facsimile exhibits







Eric said:







My point was:  of course there are viable and advantageous way to manage



educational exhibits with facsimiles.  But the exhibitors should bend



over backwards to make the distinction (for instance) between Einstein's



notebooks and facsimiles of them crystal clear before the tickets are



bought.







I'm with him.   If I'm going to PAY to see something, I want to know up

front if I'm paying to see the real thing, or a replica.   This isn't a

question of if replicas can be shown, or if they are better to show, but if

you should be showing them to a paying audience without telling them before

they plunk down their money.







I love visiting museum - I'll gladly pay fees to help support them.  But I

won't pay to see fakes, unless I know it and want to see fakes that much.







My 2 cents.







Edward















Edward Hoyenski



Assistant Curator



Rare Book & Texana Collections



University of North Texas Libraries



ehoyensk@library.unt.edu



940-565-2769



940-565-2599



P.O. Box 305190



Denton, TX 76203


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents] [Search]

 [CoOL]