I frequently encounter OCLC records without holdings. In several cases I have
tracked them down to libraries that used to report through RLIN and I have
just assumed that the holding information would eventually appear when the
RLIN migration was complete. Perhaps I was naive.
But what really puzzles me is the situation revealed by C. J. Scheiner's
recent query regarding copies of Cavallucci's LEXICON VOCUM. This comes up
as another unlocated listing in FirstSearch and WorldCat even though the book
being described is at Harvard (Houghton) and easily found in Hollis. Is this
a fluke, or are there many other records from Harvard (or other long-standing
OCLC libraries) which appear in their own online catalogues but are absent
from (or unlocated in) FirstSearch?
Jim Hinck
www.vialibri.net
At 11:29 PM 11/20/2007, you wrote:
Hello Will:
There are no holdings attached to that record in OCLC. Therefore, WorldCat
would not list a copy. It looks like Swarthmore entered the record, but
they
deleted their holdings for some reason. I believe it's OCLC's policy not
to
delete records even if all the holdings have been removed.
We here ran into the same situation.
So to clarify matters I called OCLC support.
They do not delete bib records even when there is no holding library.
They hope that someone will come around at some point and add a holding
eventually.
So your assessment is completely on point.
~Allison Rich
********************************
"Outside of a dog, a book is probably man's best friend,
and inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx"
Allison Rich
Catalogue Librarian
John Carter Brown Library
Providence, Rhode Island
Allison_Rich@brown.edu
********************************